Documentary Sicko

Documentary Sicko

Documentary Sicko, In Sicko, Michael Moore prohibits the American healthcare system and impresses audiences with its problems and failures. He tells compelling anecdotes—of struggling Americans who die from their bills, are refused treatment, or cannot afford it. In this case, Moore goes further in painting the picture of what the system seeks to achieve by magnifying people’s faces as the systems lose them through such policies. The author did an excellent job of explaining that insurance corporations consistently prioritize profit margins over patients, as the case of a woman being denied health insurance coverage for a life-threatening surgery can attest to (Heo, 2015).

APA.

Click Here To Receive Expert Guidance, Punctual Delivery,

and Customized Solutions For All Your Assignments.

Documentary Sicko

From the discovery made, this move of the film to compare the American healthcare system with that of other countries such as Canada, the United Kingdom, and Cuba gives essential information. In such countries, accessibility of health care is either free of charge or easily accessible, and none comes to be financially ruined by hospital bills. These comparisons strengthen Moore’s argument that universal healthcare systems ensure favorable access and ultimate well-being compared to privatized healthcare systems. Little focus is given to statistics in Sicko, which has a solid emotional side due to the stories of families that lost their financial stability thanks to the American healthcare system or those who have no right to receive needed treatment.

Documentary Sicko

The touching moment was when Moore, with the audience unaware, brought 9/11 first responders to Cuba, where, for their healthcare, they did not have to pay a cent. This contrast made the film more stirring and underlined the sin of the American system. Moore recommends that impact liberals introduce a similar type of health care system standard to that of other developed countries. Though he offers technologically and economically sound solutions, they sometimes appear more realistic, but they present questions about fairness. Procedural changes of such kind can barely be attempted in the United States. However, the film under consideration expresses the opinion that changes are to be initiated to cope with the existing disparities in the healthcare sphere in the USA.